Ford Has Truly Fucked Ontario's Education System behind a Cowardly Covid19 Mask

Hi Line Editor,

I hope you'll take a minute to read my response to "Doug Ford's Rules Make No Sense..."

The complete and utter confusion in the education system makes your point stronger many times over. The chaos is multiplied when the school board gets done with trying to implement. It's an insane clown show.

One example: HWDSB recently rolled out a new approved sanitizer for use on articles that will be handled by students, ie. desks, bins, countertops. The sanitizer requires a 5 minute stay on the surface, and then a water rinse. And this is to replace the previously approved product which required a 3 minute staying time.
What kindergarten or primary kid is going to sit at their desk and wait 5 minutes and not touch a wet surface? It seems like stupidity. 

Going through the typical daily email list of memos from the school administrator (principle, vice-principal) a teacher is faced with these obsessive new protocols for any number of items or procedures, and then at the same time they are being told they can sign up for the next workshop on Anti-racism or Math Curriculum strategies. 

You can just tell, you just know by reading between the lines, that the board staff are literally freaking out every day trying to do the right thing in response to the latest government "whim" – fact is, they can barely get organized to show up to work with their buttons buttoned and their zippers zipped, let alone lead an army of parents and teachers in a sensible way.

Ford's strategy of creating choices, and letting local school boards find their way is not stupidity, it is pure evil, because his government can lay blame in any number of directions. And they are already doing it, and they will keep doing it.

It is evil and destructive and irresponsible to the core. It's not just being stupid. It's about creating chaos. And in the schools it is working. 

Second example: HWDSB announced a second restructuring yesterday. In the K to 8 school I know about, 6 teachers were surplused, meaning 6 classes worth of students will no longer be attending in person starting next week and will either be doing "online" or "homeschooling". So the six teachers with least seniority are bumped into new positions, and they will no longer be working at that school where they just spent several weeks setting up their classes and getting to know their students and their families. And the remaining classes will get new students and their numbers will go up, overcrowding classrooms even more. This is because the Ontario gov't never created new class size limits, so we're working with the usual numbers of 22 kids per class, on average. One kindergarten teacher's room is not big enough to accomodate the 16 students she had before the reorganization, and now she will likely have to find space for at least 5 more students. 

Every class gets kicked over like so many bowling pins, and now the entire school setup changes. Parents who thought they were choosing to have their kids stay at school will now be learning that their child's class has closed, and the kids are being split up into two or three other classes. So much for the concept of doing our best to create safety and security for our children. 

So much for looking after peoples' mental health. Multiply that times several dozen schools, and all the school boards in Ontario, and you see that this is not stupidity. It is an evil, cutthroat strategy where you destroy the system by systematically giving up your authority to act and protect people, and you let other agents (school boards, parents) make choices. The strategy for education under the Ford government has been to sell off the pieces by giving up the choices. Lecce is the ultimate poseur. 

The system is literally coming apart from the inside because of this planned chaos.

I tell you the revolt is already happening. Teachers are crying BS and are tossing the obsessive cleanliness protocols out the window, especially  when they see inconsistencies all around.

GB

Original Article By: Josh Dehaas 

In his 1964 book The Morality of Law, Harvard law professor Lon Fuller tells the story of a benevolent king, Rex, who tries to create a legal system that works for his people. Rex starts by attempting to write down a complete set of rules but quickly gets overwhelmed; it isn’t easy to come up with general dictates that fit every situation. Rex scraps the idea of a complete code and starts judging disputes on a case-by-case basis. This doesn’t work either; Rex’s subjects say they need to know ahead of time what they can and can’t do. Rex returns to the idea of creating a code that anticipates every situation, but it turns out so wonky and opaque that his people can’t understand it. Rex loses patience with his ungrateful subjects and creates harsh new penalties including 10 years in prison for coughing and sneezing in his presence. The people revolt. Fuller sees law as a set of obligations that most people are willing to obey, even if they don’t agree with every single rule, and not just because they worry about being punished for disobeying. Fuller uses Rex to show that people will only accept a set of rules as the law if they conform to certain basic principles: they’re advertised in advance, understandable, capable of being followed, non-contradictory and stable. 

I couldn’t help but thinking of Premier Doug Ford when I read about Rex in my jurisprudence class at Osgoode Hall Law School. The COVID-19 emergency has given Ford king-like powers to make public-health rules by cabinet decree. Like Rex, he’s demonstrated that he wants what’s best for his people but he’s struggled to come up with COVID-19 laws that are clear, non-contradictory and stable. If he doesn’t fix this problem, Ontarians could end up revolting … just kidding, docile Ontarians would never actually revolt. But if he doesn’t fix this problem, we might punish Ford at the ballot box. 

One of the worst mistakes Ford has made is that so many rules are contradictory. It makes no sense to allow 10 people from up to 10 different households — as the law currently specifies in so-called “hotspots” like Toronto and Ottawa — to gather in their homes while simultaneously banning people from eating with a single family member inside a restaurant that’s taking proper health precautions, as nearly all were. 

It’s even more contradictory that my local dance studio can be open, allowing people to gyrate along with 10 strangers while spewing droplets into the air inside an enclosed space, but you can’t lift well-sanitized weights at GoodLife while standing two metres from other people wearing masks in a big open room. My neighbours on the community Facebook page seems especially enraged by the contradictions around Halloween. If children in Toronto and Ottawa can attend school with 25 others indoors, why are they being told they can’t trick-or-treat with their family outdoors while wearing masks? Many parents say they plan to ignore Ford’s advice against trick-or-treating. Will they listen to him ever again? 

Ford’s rules are also changing so frequently that they’re bound to be ignored. Consider group sizes. At a recent family barbecue with several adults and several children, somebody asked if we were technically breaking the gathering-size law. My brother-in-law seemed to think it was legal because there were fewer than 75 people present — a logical conclusion considering that 75 people was the limit at his workplace. My sister seemed to think we could have 15 to 20 — or maybe that was just the limit at daycares? It turns out the limit was 10 people indoors and 25 outdoors. Hosts can be fined up to $100,000. Who knew? 

If Ford wants Ontarians to continue following the COVID-19 rules rather than getting frustrated and giving up, he needs to simplify the law. The law should be that people from different households must stay two metres apart or wear masks in public. That means restaurants can serve indoors, but people will need to sit two metres apart unless they’re from the same household. Fitness businesses can be open with distancing in place, and people can decide for themselves whether they think spin class or weightlifting is worth it. (Hint: spin class is not worth it.) 

People can legally host whoever they like in their homes during the holidays, but they will do so knowing that it’s risky unless they stay two metres away from Grandma, or else wear a mask. There could be sensible exceptions, but in general the rule would be clear to everyone. It would address the risk of COVID-19 while treating business owners fairly and allow individuals the freedom to make choices that make sense for them, without jeopardizing the health of others. If Ford can pull that off, voters will reward him. If they remain frustrated and confused, they may throw him out like King Rex. Subscribe now Josh Dehaas is a freelance writer and student at Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto.