It is mid-October 2019 and I'm now a full six weeks into monitoring my blood sugar and maintaining a sugar-free diet. Sugar levels have averaged 6 or below, with a couple of occasional spikes up into high 7s or low 8s. Weight has stabilized at 200 lbs or slightly under. Brenda says I've taken off 30 lbs since August, cut honestly I don't recall weighing that much. I remember it being mid 220s.
Truth is, I like not having my gut entering the room before my head!
I'm now experimenting with adding small amount of naturally occurring carbs, such as a small amount of rice, or a slice of bread, or a bit of salad dressing. These carb intakes have not had any effect on my sugar levels.
I'll continue to maintain the no-sugar, as-few-carbs-as-possible diet, and also continue to ensure my protein intake is balanced.
Blood work goes in soon, and we'll see what the doc says.
The future does not just happen. It is created.
❖
We're only as free as we allow our world to be. In setting the world free, we set ourselves free. In setting ourselves free, the world becomes that much freer.
Saturday, October 05, 2019
Friday, August 23, 2019
The Diabetes Journal: Entry #2
Subtitle: Counting calories is not enough, and I will take my diet seriously.
What I eat is important,
When I eat is important.
This screen shot below shows my blood sugar levels coming down to safe levels within a couple of days of altering my diet. No insulin was being taken. I was taking Metaformin, but after one week I stopped taking it also.
I'm learning that my body is a genius at homeostasis. My chemical systems are intended by nature to monitor certain substances in my body that are critical to survival. I have many hormones which can be called into play when needed to help important processes take place.
One of those hormones is insulin. If I'm eating several times a day, and those meals contain carbs and sugars, then every time I eat I'm telling my body, "store fat."
If I can reduce the amount of times I'm eating and triggering an insulin response, then my body has time to take a step back and say, "Okay, let's get rid of some of this extra fat that is lying around." Especially if my blood isn't full of glucose from a recent snack.
I learned that my body can make glucose easily when it needs it. It can make it from proteins in my tissues, and it can make it from fat cells stored in various places and forms around my body.
A full night of fasting and good sleep is important for the brain and the body to operate properly. Jason Fund recommends fasting as a legitimate way to go, but I'm not convinced I need to do that just yet.
Two or three good meals a day should be realistic for me. And no more sugar.
What I eat is important,
When I eat is important.
This screen shot below shows my blood sugar levels coming down to safe levels within a couple of days of altering my diet. No insulin was being taken. I was taking Metaformin, but after one week I stopped taking it also.
I'm learning that my body is a genius at homeostasis. My chemical systems are intended by nature to monitor certain substances in my body that are critical to survival. I have many hormones which can be called into play when needed to help important processes take place.
One of those hormones is insulin. If I'm eating several times a day, and those meals contain carbs and sugars, then every time I eat I'm telling my body, "store fat."
If I can reduce the amount of times I'm eating and triggering an insulin response, then my body has time to take a step back and say, "Okay, let's get rid of some of this extra fat that is lying around." Especially if my blood isn't full of glucose from a recent snack.
I learned that my body can make glucose easily when it needs it. It can make it from proteins in my tissues, and it can make it from fat cells stored in various places and forms around my body.
A full night of fasting and good sleep is important for the brain and the body to operate properly. Jason Fund recommends fasting as a legitimate way to go, but I'm not convinced I need to do that just yet.
Two or three good meals a day should be realistic for me. And no more sugar.
The Diabetes Journal
Subtitle: It's Time To Get The Sugar Out Of My Body
Exactly four days ago I sat in the doctor's office and was told I have type 2 diabetes (T2D).
My blood sugar over the past three months, according to my A1C blood test, indicated an average blood sugar level of over 10. The threshold is 7.
Doctor says in my case, because the sugar is so high it is a genetic trigger. I tried to match my own symptoms with some kind of time frame, and my most notable symptoms of fatigue, foggy mind, excessive thirst and peeing, go back only two or three months.
So I went to the pharmacy with my prescription for some pills, insulin, and a blood sugar monitor. I also loaded up with some injector needles, blood pressure lancets complete with spring-loaded poking tool, test strips and a yellow plastic sharps disposal bin.
The pharmacist picked out a blood pressure monitor. The government pays for that. I have to pay for the test strips and the lancets.
The insulin comes in an easy-to-use injector. Dial it up on the end, press the button after sticking the needle into your belly or thigh or whatever. Oh yes, and clean your skin with an alcohol swab before sticking a needle in.
So I came home and looked at all of my packages.
I began to regularly check my blood sugar. I was surprised to see levels in the mid-teens, high-teens, and even 20 a couple of times. This was with no dietary changes.
At this point I began looking for more information. My doctor had given me a package of information to read. The package was poorly edited and formatted. Words were omitted. Obviously, it was a copy and paste from somewhere. One of the links for more information was The Canada Food Guide. The second link took me to a website owned and operated by Glucerna, which is a meal replacement product.
Well, thank-you doctor. You pointed me to my government's advice, and to a commercial supplier website.
Fail.
Why isn't my doctor pointing me to the latest research on T2D? I already suspect that he will defend the status quo. In fact he told me when I said to him, "If insulin is the best treatment, then why would I not want it?" and his reply was, "That's great. There's a lot of stigma around insulin; some people think it should be last resort. I'm glad you want to go right ahead. This is what I do."
I didn't realize it at the time, but I was facing up to a belief system. My doctor was lining me up for the accepted treatment, which is to treat T2D like a genetic disease that is incurable, and to treat the harmful symptom (high blood sugar) with a drug called insulin.
According to my doctor, we would begin a process of adjusting dosages and managing how much insulin I would need to keep my blood sugar down at a safe level.
He didn't tell me that taking insulin would probably lead to weight gain.
He didn't tell me that there were some serious dietary principles that I should know about. What he said was, "Diet and exercise are two of the cornerstones of good health."
That got my doctor off the hook pretty conveniently.
Then he booked me in with the dietician and the assistant nurse, and he got on with his day. "If you have any questions, give us a call," he said.
Wow. That was quick and easy.
Too easy.
Next, I turned to the web. First off I noticed that there were lots of YouTube videos about "reversal of T2D" - I found a couple of TED talks on the subject. A Canadian doctor, Jason Fung, had a high presence and very positive comment feedback on his videos. He has written a book called The Obesity Code, and also another called The Diabetes Code: Prevent and Reverse Type 2 Diabetes Naturally.
Into the rabbit hole I went. Here I am three days later, and embarking on a low-carb, high fat diet. It's time to get the sugar out of my body, and let my fat-filled liver and my fat-stuffed tissues get back into a healthier state. It's time to allow my insulin levels to self-correct as I deal with the sugar in my diet.
As Fung puts it, I need to get the sugar out of my body.
Fung also explained that the cause of insulin resistance is – wait for it – insulin. So by adding more insulin I will just make my body resist it more. It's like twiddling the knobs and not knowing what they do.
If I begin the insulin regime, I will begin a vicious cycle where my body's resistance to insulin will continue to build. I will likely need to gradually increase my dosage, while at the same time gaining weight. How is that good for me?
What Jason Fung explains is that insulin, when injected artificially as a treatment for high blood sugar, is incorrectly perceived as a cure. Far from the fact, it is making things worse. Insulin, when added to the system, has the effect of "cramming" sugar into wherever the body can take it. So the result, over years, is a fat-filled liver, fat-filled cells, deposits of fat all over the body. Every time we eat, especially when we eat foods with carbs or sugars, we are telling the body "get insulin" and "store fat." And my body isn't producing the insulin for a reason. There is an underlying hormonal problem which I will address through dietary change and behavioural change, not by taking insulin.
So I have decided that I will take my diet seriously for the first time in my life.
A couple of very significant videos have changed my thinking. I've put them here for convenience.
Jason Fung
BBC Documentary on high-fact, low carb diet.
The corporate influence behind the "low fat" diet falsehood.
Upbeat and almost irritating, but very on-point about changing the dietary playbook in our heads.
Exactly four days ago I sat in the doctor's office and was told I have type 2 diabetes (T2D).
My blood sugar over the past three months, according to my A1C blood test, indicated an average blood sugar level of over 10. The threshold is 7.
Doctor says in my case, because the sugar is so high it is a genetic trigger. I tried to match my own symptoms with some kind of time frame, and my most notable symptoms of fatigue, foggy mind, excessive thirst and peeing, go back only two or three months.
So I went to the pharmacy with my prescription for some pills, insulin, and a blood sugar monitor. I also loaded up with some injector needles, blood pressure lancets complete with spring-loaded poking tool, test strips and a yellow plastic sharps disposal bin.
The pharmacist picked out a blood pressure monitor. The government pays for that. I have to pay for the test strips and the lancets.
The insulin comes in an easy-to-use injector. Dial it up on the end, press the button after sticking the needle into your belly or thigh or whatever. Oh yes, and clean your skin with an alcohol swab before sticking a needle in.
So I came home and looked at all of my packages.
I began to regularly check my blood sugar. I was surprised to see levels in the mid-teens, high-teens, and even 20 a couple of times. This was with no dietary changes.
At this point I began looking for more information. My doctor had given me a package of information to read. The package was poorly edited and formatted. Words were omitted. Obviously, it was a copy and paste from somewhere. One of the links for more information was The Canada Food Guide. The second link took me to a website owned and operated by Glucerna, which is a meal replacement product.
Well, thank-you doctor. You pointed me to my government's advice, and to a commercial supplier website.
Fail.
Why isn't my doctor pointing me to the latest research on T2D? I already suspect that he will defend the status quo. In fact he told me when I said to him, "If insulin is the best treatment, then why would I not want it?" and his reply was, "That's great. There's a lot of stigma around insulin; some people think it should be last resort. I'm glad you want to go right ahead. This is what I do."
I didn't realize it at the time, but I was facing up to a belief system. My doctor was lining me up for the accepted treatment, which is to treat T2D like a genetic disease that is incurable, and to treat the harmful symptom (high blood sugar) with a drug called insulin.
According to my doctor, we would begin a process of adjusting dosages and managing how much insulin I would need to keep my blood sugar down at a safe level.
He didn't tell me that taking insulin would probably lead to weight gain.
He didn't tell me that there were some serious dietary principles that I should know about. What he said was, "Diet and exercise are two of the cornerstones of good health."
That got my doctor off the hook pretty conveniently.
Then he booked me in with the dietician and the assistant nurse, and he got on with his day. "If you have any questions, give us a call," he said.
Wow. That was quick and easy.
Too easy.
Next, I turned to the web. First off I noticed that there were lots of YouTube videos about "reversal of T2D" - I found a couple of TED talks on the subject. A Canadian doctor, Jason Fung, had a high presence and very positive comment feedback on his videos. He has written a book called The Obesity Code, and also another called The Diabetes Code: Prevent and Reverse Type 2 Diabetes Naturally.
Into the rabbit hole I went. Here I am three days later, and embarking on a low-carb, high fat diet. It's time to get the sugar out of my body, and let my fat-filled liver and my fat-stuffed tissues get back into a healthier state. It's time to allow my insulin levels to self-correct as I deal with the sugar in my diet.
As Fung puts it, I need to get the sugar out of my body.
Fung also explained that the cause of insulin resistance is – wait for it – insulin. So by adding more insulin I will just make my body resist it more. It's like twiddling the knobs and not knowing what they do.
If I begin the insulin regime, I will begin a vicious cycle where my body's resistance to insulin will continue to build. I will likely need to gradually increase my dosage, while at the same time gaining weight. How is that good for me?
What Jason Fung explains is that insulin, when injected artificially as a treatment for high blood sugar, is incorrectly perceived as a cure. Far from the fact, it is making things worse. Insulin, when added to the system, has the effect of "cramming" sugar into wherever the body can take it. So the result, over years, is a fat-filled liver, fat-filled cells, deposits of fat all over the body. Every time we eat, especially when we eat foods with carbs or sugars, we are telling the body "get insulin" and "store fat." And my body isn't producing the insulin for a reason. There is an underlying hormonal problem which I will address through dietary change and behavioural change, not by taking insulin.
So I have decided that I will take my diet seriously for the first time in my life.
A couple of very significant videos have changed my thinking. I've put them here for convenience.
Jason Fung
BBC Documentary on high-fact, low carb diet.
The corporate influence behind the "low fat" diet falsehood.
Upbeat and almost irritating, but very on-point about changing the dietary playbook in our heads.
Update posted August 2021
Saturday, August 03, 2019
One Strange Rock
"We are the only species on this planet that can construct realities in our mind, and then go actually build it." ~ Leland Melvin, astronaut
For three billion years life didn't even have a brain.
Chance, coincidence, and impossible odds.
Humans do things that might seem pointless. But we do these things because we're smart.
The human brain sets us apart from all other creatures on this planet. Inside there's a vast network with a hundred trillion connections. That's more than the number of stars in our Milky Way. All this depends on tiny cells sending electrical signals called neurons.
Most of life on earth does just fine without a brain. Some brainless creatures are so successful you can even see them from space. e.g. coral animals and the huge reefs they create. Life needs to sense its surroundings, otherwise it's just flailing in the dark.
You don't just hear with your ears. You hear with your brain.
The eagle is like a weaponized telescope. To see like an eagle you need more than eagle eyes. You need an eagle brain. If you're an animal with eyes, you're going to need a bigger brain.
Each creature had to develop an array of senses, and brains to support them.
The planet's significant and varied landscapes shaped the brains of each species. It was the same for human type of creatures.
How come humans are so different? Just because a macaque can shuck oysters with a rock doesn't mean it will want to open a seafood restaurant. But a human wants to create that next level.
Fire. As far as we know, this planet is the only one with the right conditions for fire to burn. But fire also allows us to cook food. It's more than making it tasty. It helps the food to break down so our brains have access to more nutrients quicker. One of the key events in our ancestral history is when food was cooked for the first time.
Fossils that were once at the bottom of the sea show us that parts of the earth's surface have been forced upward. There are overarching themes that are visible from space which are the ways the earth has geologically developed.
It's hard to know how our ancestors adapted to changing climate and vegetation conditions. However, we came out the end with bigger brains, and we went across the planet.
How do you get a brain that can tell a damn good story? We have learned to speak.
We link signs and sounds to thoughts and things. In countless ways creating almost infinite meaning. That takes a lot of brain power! So why do we have any language at all?
It's partly connected to the sizes of our brains. One theory is that it was something really tiny. One gene that we humans posses, if you don't have it, you'll struggle to talk. We don't know where this gene came from, but it gave us more precise control over our lips and tongues. A small genetic twist gave us the ability to hear and articulate fine nuanced sounds.
The ability to work as a team to accomplish something great is significant. The importance of communications can't be overstated. Communicating helps you face failure without fear.
Our brains can find work-arounds. A brain over time, can find ways to compensate for losses or changes forced upon it.
Our brains give us language. Writing lets us pass on that knowledge in time.
The astronauts say that the colours from earth which burst into your eyeballs from space are overwhelming.
Everything we've achieved as a species is the product of a lucky chain of accidents. "To get here we needed a planet to congeal, out of dust in the right place for life to form and mold our world, allowing us to breathe and grow complex. We needed to be shielded from the sun, gifted with a moon. and granted seasons. We needed just enough bombardment and near annihilation to let life meander through its twists and turns and evolve a species with a brain as complex as yours and mine."
With these 86 billion neurons we've left the planet and looked far, far out into the universe trying to unravel the mystery of the cosmos. But no matter how far out we look, the most far out thing we've found is right between our ears!
For three billion years life didn't even have a brain.
Chance, coincidence, and impossible odds.
Humans do things that might seem pointless. But we do these things because we're smart.
The human brain sets us apart from all other creatures on this planet. Inside there's a vast network with a hundred trillion connections. That's more than the number of stars in our Milky Way. All this depends on tiny cells sending electrical signals called neurons.
Most of life on earth does just fine without a brain. Some brainless creatures are so successful you can even see them from space. e.g. coral animals and the huge reefs they create. Life needs to sense its surroundings, otherwise it's just flailing in the dark.
You don't just hear with your ears. You hear with your brain.
The eagle is like a weaponized telescope. To see like an eagle you need more than eagle eyes. You need an eagle brain. If you're an animal with eyes, you're going to need a bigger brain.
Each creature had to develop an array of senses, and brains to support them.
The planet's significant and varied landscapes shaped the brains of each species. It was the same for human type of creatures.
How come humans are so different? Just because a macaque can shuck oysters with a rock doesn't mean it will want to open a seafood restaurant. But a human wants to create that next level.
Fire. As far as we know, this planet is the only one with the right conditions for fire to burn. But fire also allows us to cook food. It's more than making it tasty. It helps the food to break down so our brains have access to more nutrients quicker. One of the key events in our ancestral history is when food was cooked for the first time.
Fossils that were once at the bottom of the sea show us that parts of the earth's surface have been forced upward. There are overarching themes that are visible from space which are the ways the earth has geologically developed.
It's hard to know how our ancestors adapted to changing climate and vegetation conditions. However, we came out the end with bigger brains, and we went across the planet.
How do you get a brain that can tell a damn good story? We have learned to speak.
We link signs and sounds to thoughts and things. In countless ways creating almost infinite meaning. That takes a lot of brain power! So why do we have any language at all?
It's partly connected to the sizes of our brains. One theory is that it was something really tiny. One gene that we humans posses, if you don't have it, you'll struggle to talk. We don't know where this gene came from, but it gave us more precise control over our lips and tongues. A small genetic twist gave us the ability to hear and articulate fine nuanced sounds.
The ability to work as a team to accomplish something great is significant. The importance of communications can't be overstated. Communicating helps you face failure without fear.
Our brains can find work-arounds. A brain over time, can find ways to compensate for losses or changes forced upon it.
Our brains give us language. Writing lets us pass on that knowledge in time.
The astronauts say that the colours from earth which burst into your eyeballs from space are overwhelming.
Everything we've achieved as a species is the product of a lucky chain of accidents. "To get here we needed a planet to congeal, out of dust in the right place for life to form and mold our world, allowing us to breathe and grow complex. We needed to be shielded from the sun, gifted with a moon. and granted seasons. We needed just enough bombardment and near annihilation to let life meander through its twists and turns and evolve a species with a brain as complex as yours and mine."
With these 86 billion neurons we've left the planet and looked far, far out into the universe trying to unravel the mystery of the cosmos. But no matter how far out we look, the most far out thing we've found is right between our ears!
Friday, August 02, 2019
Music Hamilton: Two Important emails
July 31, 2019
Hi Jeff,
Despite my enthusiastic agreement last Thursday about launching Music Hamilton by August 31st I’ve had sober second thoughts and I must tell you that I can’t commit to this.
Yesterday I took the time to listen to the entire recorded session hosted by HCF where Tom Wilson and Kojo shared. I found Tom’s words telling. He basically said, “I don’t know what needs to be done.” Tom’s take on the situation is that artists must be the driving force; they make their own desperate way and they bring the songs and the stories to us. He wants us as “music industry people” to not forget the artist’s key role in being tellers of the city’s history.
I care and feel strongly about the music community and the music industry in Hamilton, but I can’t commit to forging a company with such lofty goals that seeks to become a significant force – in fact, the brand champion for Hamilton: City of Music – connecting people, producing events, achieving basic social justice steps and support for musicians, and boosting the industry. Not from zero. Not with two people and zero capital. If we are really talking about starting, funding, shaping and growing a corporation that is meant to be big in five or ten years, I don’t see how.
Maybe it’s too soon?
I am not looking for any more volunteer hours. None.
I know we have agreed that this will just start as a planting of a seed, with very small objectives at first. But, an August 31 launch would mean dozens of hours, and that would only increase constantly with time as you and I scramble around trying to do our corporate diligence. I’ve already given 4 hours to the NUANS search. I’m not able to commit to the years that building this business will require. Yes, we talked about getting funding for basic administrative and executive staff, but in front of that is likely a couple hundred volunteer hours. I just see a wall. No start-up capital for me means I’m out.
Thank-you for your undying enthusiasm, your confidence in me, and your friendship.
Best regards,
Glen
----------------
Hey Glen,
Thanks for the email. Hope you’re having a good week.
No worry here either. I have been having the same thoughts about the initiative. You’re right and I agree that it could not be done for August 31 even if we worked everyday. It’s too up in the air and we would very much need start up capital of some nature. And I also agree that I don’t want to volunteer my life away anymore either. I’ve over-volunteered enough the past 20 years and burned out from it. I get you there. The initiative does need capital to get it off the ground and I don’t think that is impossible, but it would still take some time still as you said. I also thought that the Music Hamilton might’ve been better approached as a for-profit project.
I do think the Music Hamilton concept would work with specific goals and funding and the right partnership. Tom is right about the artists being the driving force but he also supports what Madeline and I and the music team wanted to accomplish. His view is that our city is incompetent and the wrong place for this kind of activity. And despite all the input from musicians, music business people, etc. the city didn’t listen (but we did). Other cities have done it right but they have progressive elected officials and staff, we don’t really at all. I’ve talked about this with Tom a lot over the past few years and the role of the city’s original music team was suppose to be that music community catalyst — Music Hamilton could be the catalyst that the music team was suppose to be. Tom saw that we were in fact part of the music community as business people and musicians/artists — and that is what Tom, Madeline and I talked about — we knew what to do or what needed to be done.
So the bottom line for me is I think it is still an important initiative for Hamilton, for our music community and for us. I’m just not sure what approach is most appropriate right now. But there’s no doubt in my mind that the advisory team is as lame as can be and will accomplish very little for the bigger music community. The economic impact study, if done right, should have a lot of data to review, analyze, etc. and perhaps we could wait for that to happen to see what the report reveals. But I am going to meet with Lou at TAH to see what his plans are for the bar, live music, him, etc. in Hamilton. Lou would be vital to any resurgence of the Live Music Venue Alliance.
It’s sad that nothing seems to work in Hamilton when it comes to supporting the music scene. It’s a track record of collapses — Hamilton Music Awards, the music strategy, the city of music project, the Blues Society, etc. I still think it can change but like you said, neither of us are willing to put in all the volunteer hours it would take on our own without remuneration of some sort.
Anyway, just a few thoughts. I think we’re on the same page. And we’ve both been frustrated with other initiatives we’ve been part of so it’s hard to jump up for another project when we are unsure of whether we can get it to happen without sacrificing our life. Lol.
See you when I get back. Let’s get together for lunch. And I you have the cover art for Brenda’s album - can’t wait to see (and hear) it.
Jeff
----------
Hi Jeff,
Despite my enthusiastic agreement last Thursday about launching Music Hamilton by August 31st I’ve had sober second thoughts and I must tell you that I can’t commit to this.
Yesterday I took the time to listen to the entire recorded session hosted by HCF where Tom Wilson and Kojo shared. I found Tom’s words telling. He basically said, “I don’t know what needs to be done.” Tom’s take on the situation is that artists must be the driving force; they make their own desperate way and they bring the songs and the stories to us. He wants us as “music industry people” to not forget the artist’s key role in being tellers of the city’s history.
I care and feel strongly about the music community and the music industry in Hamilton, but I can’t commit to forging a company with such lofty goals that seeks to become a significant force – in fact, the brand champion for Hamilton: City of Music – connecting people, producing events, achieving basic social justice steps and support for musicians, and boosting the industry. Not from zero. Not with two people and zero capital. If we are really talking about starting, funding, shaping and growing a corporation that is meant to be big in five or ten years, I don’t see how.
Maybe it’s too soon?
I am not looking for any more volunteer hours. None.
I know we have agreed that this will just start as a planting of a seed, with very small objectives at first. But, an August 31 launch would mean dozens of hours, and that would only increase constantly with time as you and I scramble around trying to do our corporate diligence. I’ve already given 4 hours to the NUANS search. I’m not able to commit to the years that building this business will require. Yes, we talked about getting funding for basic administrative and executive staff, but in front of that is likely a couple hundred volunteer hours. I just see a wall. No start-up capital for me means I’m out.
Thank-you for your undying enthusiasm, your confidence in me, and your friendship.
Best regards,
Glen
----------------
Hey Glen,
Thanks for the email. Hope you’re having a good week.
No worry here either. I have been having the same thoughts about the initiative. You’re right and I agree that it could not be done for August 31 even if we worked everyday. It’s too up in the air and we would very much need start up capital of some nature. And I also agree that I don’t want to volunteer my life away anymore either. I’ve over-volunteered enough the past 20 years and burned out from it. I get you there. The initiative does need capital to get it off the ground and I don’t think that is impossible, but it would still take some time still as you said. I also thought that the Music Hamilton might’ve been better approached as a for-profit project.
I do think the Music Hamilton concept would work with specific goals and funding and the right partnership. Tom is right about the artists being the driving force but he also supports what Madeline and I and the music team wanted to accomplish. His view is that our city is incompetent and the wrong place for this kind of activity. And despite all the input from musicians, music business people, etc. the city didn’t listen (but we did). Other cities have done it right but they have progressive elected officials and staff, we don’t really at all. I’ve talked about this with Tom a lot over the past few years and the role of the city’s original music team was suppose to be that music community catalyst — Music Hamilton could be the catalyst that the music team was suppose to be. Tom saw that we were in fact part of the music community as business people and musicians/artists — and that is what Tom, Madeline and I talked about — we knew what to do or what needed to be done.
So the bottom line for me is I think it is still an important initiative for Hamilton, for our music community and for us. I’m just not sure what approach is most appropriate right now. But there’s no doubt in my mind that the advisory team is as lame as can be and will accomplish very little for the bigger music community. The economic impact study, if done right, should have a lot of data to review, analyze, etc. and perhaps we could wait for that to happen to see what the report reveals. But I am going to meet with Lou at TAH to see what his plans are for the bar, live music, him, etc. in Hamilton. Lou would be vital to any resurgence of the Live Music Venue Alliance.
It’s sad that nothing seems to work in Hamilton when it comes to supporting the music scene. It’s a track record of collapses — Hamilton Music Awards, the music strategy, the city of music project, the Blues Society, etc. I still think it can change but like you said, neither of us are willing to put in all the volunteer hours it would take on our own without remuneration of some sort.
Anyway, just a few thoughts. I think we’re on the same page. And we’ve both been frustrated with other initiatives we’ve been part of so it’s hard to jump up for another project when we are unsure of whether we can get it to happen without sacrificing our life. Lol.
See you when I get back. Let’s get together for lunch. And I you have the cover art for Brenda’s album - can’t wait to see (and hear) it.
Jeff
----------
These two emails reflect the end of a seven year long chain of events. Jeff Martin and I worked together on my three magazines. His enthusiasm and editorial skills were significant elements in the completion of those projects. For the Music Strategy Implementation Team, we served on it together from its formation in 2012. We were both on the team when it imploded. Jeff basically was thrown under the bus. Half the members left. I stayed on and resigned a year later. Jeff and I carried the idea of an alternate corporation called Music Hamilton which would become a brand champion for Hamilton's music community and industries – basically a service company that would help artists and groups seek grants, give them a leg up, create performance opportunities, produce a blues festival, resurrect the Hamilton Music Awards, etc.
These two letters represent Jeff and I agreeing to let Music Hamilton go, for now.
These two letters represent Jeff and I agreeing to let Music Hamilton go, for now.
Thursday, August 01, 2019
60-Year-Old Imaginary Me Talking About A 100 Year Old Cabin
The imaginary year is 2021. This is the story of the log cabin I bought in 2019 for the sum of $12000.00.
The property was in a town called Nakina, Ontario which is about as far as you can travel on an actual road before you then have to fly in by plane. Nakina is about a half hour drive north of Geraldton off the Trans-Canada highway, northern route. My friend Ken Williams lives in Smooth Rock Falls, a mere four-and-a-half hour drive to the east of Geraldton. To drive there from Hamilton is a two day trip.
Nakina is surrounded by great fishing and hunting. It was originally founded as a support for the railway, but now that purpose has subsided. The town is now surviving as a hub for hunting and fishing tourism, with the Nakina airport being used by local pilots. You can fly in from Thunder Bay.
This log cabin was built around 1923 by a Finnish guy. Since then it has stood the test of time. There is no sewer or water hookup and the interior is unfinished. So back in 2019 I looked into the registry and found that the owner was a local outfitter and that he had paid $1500 for it in 2017. Basically he had done nothing to the property and I suppose he was using it to accommodate customers while they were waiting to fly in to one of his nearby fishing camps, or he was planning to fix it up for that purposes.
Asking price was $15000. The lot size in town was about 50 ft by 150 ft. Again, no hydro or water hookups were in place and the cabin was being sold "as is." I took the opportunity to figure out how to do a title search and discovered that there is a provincial tool called Teranet which is the public registry for all properties in the province. A few years ago the government digitized all property records. As it turned out, the owner had paid only $1500 for the title to the property in 2017. I figured I had nothing to lose so I put in my offer of $9950. After a bit of back and forth we settled on $12000.
I had thought long and hard about the options. There was absolutely no practical reason for me to leave it there and fix it up or flip it. The cost of adding water and sewer and hydro connections and upgrading the building with insulation etc. made no sense.
For me the exciting piece was to save and move the cabin shell as an authentic restoration project. The cabin would be disassembled, moved to an ideal location at some future date and then rebuilt on a proper foundation with services and insulation so that it can become a year-round dwelling, or at the very least a seasonal cottage with basic comforts of water and sewer and hydro.
For me the exciting piece was to save and move the cabin shell as an authentic restoration project. The cabin would be disassembled, moved to an ideal location at some future date and then rebuilt on a proper foundation with services and insulation so that it can become a year-round dwelling, or at the very least a seasonal cottage with basic comforts of water and sewer and hydro.
When the deal closed my plan was in place. For the first winter I made sure that the roof repairs were made to keep the interior dry. In the spring of 2020 I arranged to get a shipping container delivered to the site and then I went up in July for a couple of weeks. A friend and I disassembled the cabin and tagged every log so that it could be put back together. We put the entire structure in storage in the shipping container and left it there in Nakina on the property for the winter of 2020.
I've been keeping an eye out for a suitable location on which to rebuild the cabin. My goal is to have the cabin rebuilt by its 100th anniversary in 2023.
[Update July 2019: The cabin idea was never completed. I had originally thought it would be cool to rebuild the cabin on a half-acre lot in Temiskaming that I had purchased. Brenda thought it to be a waste of money, and that whatever gets built on that property should be something new. She (correctly) saw this as an old, decrepit cabin that actually has no historic value, especially if moved off site.]
[Update July 2019: The cabin idea was never completed. I had originally thought it would be cool to rebuild the cabin on a half-acre lot in Temiskaming that I had purchased. Brenda thought it to be a waste of money, and that whatever gets built on that property should be something new. She (correctly) saw this as an old, decrepit cabin that actually has no historic value, especially if moved off site.]
Saturday, June 22, 2019
What I'm Reading 2019: Stephen Kinzer, The Brothers
The remarkable documentary about Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles, two American patriots who were key movers in the Eisenhower era. Together they were instrumental in inspiring and enacting the American foreign policy of intervention, bullying and deposing of governments in developing countries. The overt policies of Foster Dulles who was Secretary of State worked hand in hand with the top-secret tactics of brother Allen. Remarkably, using the over-inflated threat of world communist takeover as the rationale, they blatantly intervened to influence political people and events in countries with which they deemed the USA had significant business interests.
The book goes into intimate details about campaigns, over and covert, to overthrow and blatantly push for American outcomes in Guatemala, Iran, Congo, Indonesia, Cuba.
Tactics included buying political allegiance with millions of dollars approved by Eisenhower, all top secret; supporting alternate leaders with money, false news stories and actual false content; manipulating the local playing field in whatever way possible; and ultimately participating in the direct assassination of a leader (Congo's Lumumba).
By playing upon and building up the fears of the people and members of congress with regard to communism, and with Eisenhower in agreement directing this secret choir of bullies, the Dulles brothers were given billions of dollars in resources to play their weird game of chess.
What I'm Reading In 2019: Joshua Safran, Free Spirit
An incredible story of a boy whose childhood consisted of being dragged around the US midwest by his single mom, living in off-grid communes, hippie farms, and new-age wacko towns. It shows how the mom's sincere but sincerely wrong belief can lead to a wasted life and needless self-inflicted grief. She had been raised with strong anti-government bias, and spent too much energy trying to escape from the clutches of what she believed was the evils of government, corruption and capitalism in "the system."
The book tells the story of the boy Josh watching his mother being abused by a shyster father figure who came into their lives and basically destroyed what was a peaceful coexistence with his mom. It reflects on Josh's coming of age and his increasing self-awareness of how life actually is. Josh ultimately has more courage within him than he originally believes and he finally takes matters into his own hands and chases the asshole out the door. The story also shows the brutality and bully instincts of school kids who have absolutely no class, and reveals a Lord Of The Flies world of violence, classism, and potential murder which exists closer to each of us than we think. Ultimately the book is a story of triumph and extremely inspiring to me.
What I'm Reading in 2019: Richard Wagamese, Indian Horse
Sad, instructive. Important that I read this story and realize once again that my country has been guilty of cultural genocide since its inception.
"Nothing about us without us."
Saturday, June 15, 2019
Wednesday, May 29, 2019
"All These Things" by Bertrand Russell
- Man is the product of causes which had no prevision of the end they were achieving; that
- His origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental collocations of atoms; that
- No fire, no heroism, no intensity of thought and feeling, can preserve an individual life beyond the grave; that
- All the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and that
- The whole temple of Man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruins...
all these things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain, that
- no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand. Only within the scaffolding of these truths, only on the firm foundation of unyielding despair, can the soul's habitation henceforth be safely built." - Bertrand Russell, A Free Man's Worship
A strange mystery it is that
Nature,
omnipotent but blind, in the revolutions of her secular hurryings through the abysses of space,
has brought forth at last a child
subject still to her power
but
gifted with sight,
with knowledge of good and evil,
with the capacity of judging all the works of his unthinking mother.
Bertrand Russell, Why I Am Not a Christian and Other Essays on Religion and Related Subjects
In "Reflections on My Eightieth Birthday" ("Postscript" in his Autobiography), Russell wrote: "I have lived in the pursuit of a vision, both personal and social. Personal: to care for what is noble, for what is beautiful, for what is gentle; to allow moments of insight to give wisdom at more mundane times. Social: to see in imagination the society that is to be created, where individuals grow freely, and where hate and greed and envy die because there is nothing to nourish them. These things I believe, and the world, for all its horrors, has left me unshaken".
Saturday, May 25, 2019
Tuesday, March 26, 2019
The End of the Show: The Truman Show

The profound moment in the movie "The Truman Show" where Truman realizes his world is a television set. His boat has just bumped into the giant screen/wall. What he thought was a vast expanse of blue sky was just an illusion.
"Who are you?" says Truman to the voice coming from the sky.
"I am the creator of a television show that gives hope and joy and inspiration to millions."
"Then who am I?" Truman says.
"You were the star."
"Was nothing real?"
"You were real. That's what made you so good to watch."
At which point the creator attempts to talk Truman into staying, reminding him that the world out there is unpredictable, and that if he stays on the set then no harm will come to him.




At which point Truman turns his back on the illusion and departs.
Thursday, March 07, 2019
Breaduary from Instagram: February 2019
. #breaduary DAY 23 Just showing up is what mattered today. #sourdough #healthyfood #multigrainbreadA post shared by Glen Brown (@hamilton_music_and_food_guy) on
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


































